Although very empirical and you will theoretical search up until now possess focused on new negative effects of uncertainty into affect (Grey and you will McN; Hirsh et al., 2012; Grupe and Nitschke, 2013; Carleton, 2016a), you will find particular experimental research recommending one uncertainty has results (Kurtz ainsi que al., 2007) and have now intensifies (Bar-Anan et al., 2009) or dampens affective attitude (van Dijk and you may Zeelenberg, 2006). The obvious question for you is as to why suspicion results in such other consequences and what points reasonable and mediate its outcomes? Current theoretic tissues don’t desire clearly into the matchmaking ranging from suspicion and you may apply to, and are also descriptive in the place of explanatory. We suggest that uncertainty affects affective states from the compelling the newest rational simulation away from you can future outcomes. Concurrently, men and women have a propensity to generally replicate bad outcomes, and this, therefore, can create negative apply to. I including recommend the presence of a handful of important moderators of the processes, in addition to perspective and other problem circumstances, and private distinctions eg suspicion tolerance. All of our synthesis also highlights just how bad solutions to suspicion can also be controlled by feelings regulation actions. In the end, we provide hypotheses made by all of our strategy, highlight extremely important education openings, and you will guaranteeing portion for coming browse, one another empirical and you can conceptual, to improve the knowledge of the partnership anywhere between uncertainty and you can apply to.
Disagreement of great interest
The article authors say that the analysis is actually presented in the lack of any commercial or monetary relationship that could be construed because a prospective dispute of interest.
Sources
Anderson, E. C., and you may Barrett, L. F. (2016). Affective opinions influence sensation of eating meat. PLoS One 11, 1–16. doi: /record.pone.0160424
Anderson, Elizabeth. C., Siegel, Elizabeth. H., Bliss-Moreau, Age., and you can Barrett, L. F. (2011). The brand new visual feeling off gossip. Research 332, 1446–1448. doi: /research.1201574
Babayan, B. Meters., Uchida, N., and Gershman, S. J. (2018). Faith condition representation about dopamine system. Natmun. 9:1891. doi: /s41467-018-04397-0
Bar-Anan, Y., Wilson, T. D., and you will Gilbert, D. T. (2009). The feeling out-of uncertainty intensifies affective responses. Feelings 9, 123–127. doi: /a0014607
Barlow, D. H., Ellard, K. K., Fairholme, C., Farchione, T. J., Boisseau, C., Allen, L., et al. (2011). Harmonious method for the transdiagnostic therapy of psychological disorders. New york, Nyc, USA: Oxford College Push.
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Solving the fresh new feelings paradox: categorization and connection with feelings. Individual. Soc. Psychol. Rev. ten, 20–46. doi: /s15327957pspr1001_2
Barrett, L. F., and you may Satisfaction-Moreau, E. (2009). Apply at because a psychological primitive. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41, 167–218. doi: /S0065-2601(08)00404-8
Barrett, L. F., Lindquist, K., Bliss-Moreau, Elizabeth., Duncan, S., Gendron, Yards., Mize, J., et al. (2007a). Of mice and you may boys: sheer kinds of thinking regarding the mammalian attention? A response to Pank;312. Available at:
Barrett, L. F., Ochsner, K. N., and you will Gross, J. J. (2007b). “Towards automaticity of feelings” inside the Public therapy and the unconscious: The latest automaticity from large mental processes. ed. Bargh, J. A good. (Nyc, NY: Psychology Force), Vol. 58, 173–217.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., and you can Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is actually stronger than a. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5, 323–370. doi: -2680.5.4.323
Bechara, Good., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., and Damasio, A good. R. (2005). The latest Iowa betting task and somatic marker hypothesis: particular inquiries and you minichat yorumlar will solutions. Trends Cogn. Sci. nine, 159–162. doi: /j.tics.
Boswell, J. F., Thompson-Hollands, J., Farchione, T. J., and you can Barlow, D. H. (2013). Intolerance of suspicion: a familiar factor in the treating of mental issues. J. Clin. Psychol. 69, 630–645. doi: /jclp.21965
Buckner, Roentgen. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. Roentgen., and you may Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and you will benefits so you’re able to disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1124, 1–38. doi: /annals.
コメント